[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15593309#comment-15593309 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CXF-6986: ------------------------------------- Github user johnament commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/182#discussion_r84393963 --- Diff: integration/cdi/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/cdi/CdiUtil.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + * specific language governing permissions and limitations + * under the License. + */ +package org.apache.cxf.cdi; --- End diff -- The problem is that its duplicated. CDI 2.0 is introducing a better bean definition tool, would prefer to wait until that's available to leverage. > Don't require an application class if using CDI > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: CXF-6986 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6986 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 3.1.6 > Reporter: John D. Ament > > The current CXF-CDI integration assumes there will be an application class. > It would be great if CXF did not require an application class, to simplify > developer workload. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)