[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15595084#comment-15595084 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CXF-6986: ------------------------------------- Github user reta commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/182#discussion_r84469141 --- Diff: integration/cdi/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/cdi/CdiBusBean.java --- @@ -61,44 +53,14 @@ public String getName() { return CXF; } - @SuppressWarnings("serial") - @Override - public Set< Annotation > getQualifiers() { - Set<Annotation> qualifiers = new HashSet<Annotation>(); - qualifiers.add(new AnnotationLiteral< Default >() { }); - qualifiers.add(new AnnotationLiteral< Any >() { }); - return qualifiers; - } - @Override public Set<Type> getTypes() { - final Set< Type > types = new HashSet< Type >(); + final Set< Type > types = super.getTypes(); --- End diff -- `final Set< Type > types = new HashSet<>(super.getTypes());`, it is just safer > Don't require an application class if using CDI > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: CXF-6986 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6986 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 3.1.6 > Reporter: John D. Ament > > The current CXF-CDI integration assumes there will be an application class. > It would be great if CXF did not require an application class, to simplify > developer workload. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)