[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15595084#comment-15595084
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CXF-6986:
-------------------------------------

Github user reta commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/182#discussion_r84469141
  
    --- Diff: integration/cdi/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/cdi/CdiBusBean.java 
---
    @@ -61,44 +53,14 @@ public String getName() {
             return CXF;
         }
     
    -    @SuppressWarnings("serial")
    -    @Override
    -    public Set< Annotation > getQualifiers() {
    -        Set<Annotation> qualifiers = new HashSet<Annotation>();
    -        qualifiers.add(new AnnotationLiteral< Default >() { });
    -        qualifiers.add(new AnnotationLiteral< Any >() { });
    -        return qualifiers;
    -    }
    -
         @Override
         public Set<Type> getTypes() {
    -        final Set< Type > types = new HashSet< Type >();
    +        final Set< Type > types = super.getTypes();
    --- End diff --
    
    `final Set< Type > types = new HashSet<>(super.getTypes());`, it is just 
safer 


> Don't require an application class if using CDI
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-6986
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6986
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.6
>            Reporter: John D. Ament
>
> The current CXF-CDI integration assumes there will be an application class.  
> It would be great if CXF did not require an application class, to simplify 
> developer workload.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to