[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15572828#comment-15572828
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-4373:
---------------------------------------
Github user parthchandra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/600#discussion_r83281827
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/ExecConstants.java ---
@@ -132,6 +132,8 @@
OptionValidator PARQUET_VECTOR_FILL_CHECK_THRESHOLD_VALIDATOR = new
PositiveLongValidator(PARQUET_VECTOR_FILL_CHECK_THRESHOLD, 100l, 10l);
String PARQUET_NEW_RECORD_READER = "store.parquet.use_new_reader";
OptionValidator PARQUET_RECORD_READER_IMPLEMENTATION_VALIDATOR = new
BooleanValidator(PARQUET_NEW_RECORD_READER, false);
+ String PARQUET_READER_INT96_AS_TIMESTAMP =
"store.parquet.int96_as_timestamp";
--- End diff --
Should rename this to store.parquet.reader.abc to make it clear this is a
reader only property
> Drill and Hive have incompatible timestamp representations in parquet
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-4373
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4373
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Storage - Hive, Storage - Parquet
> Affects Versions: 1.8.0
> Reporter: Rahul Challapalli
> Assignee: Karthikeyan Manivannan
> Labels: doc-impacting
> Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>
> git.commit.id.abbrev=83d460c
> I created a parquet file with a timestamp type using Drill. Now if I define a
> hive table on top of the parquet file and use "timestamp" as the column type,
> drill fails to read the hive table through the hive storage plugin
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
