[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-8465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17792114#comment-17792114
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-8465:
---------------------------------------
pjfanning opened a new pull request, #2853:
URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2853
## Description
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-8465
I'm not happy with the class check here. I don't know to what extent that we
need to support subclasses that a user might make of Iceberg classes. If we
need to support subclasses of Iceberg classes, it might be better to support a
config option that allows users to extend the allow list for classes in this
deserialization code.
In this PR, the allow list is:
* java primitives
* java/javax classes
* org.apache.iceberg classes
* org.apache.drill classes
* arrays of the types listed above
* messiest bit is the support for any subclass of iceberg ScanTask class
> check data input when loading iceberg data
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-8465
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-8465
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Storage - Iceberg
> Reporter: PJ Fanning
> Priority: Major
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
