[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18117061#comment-18117061
 ] 

MARAM SAI SWARAN commented on FINERACT-2830:
--------------------------------------------

Hi [~avivijay] ,

The draft PR’s API backward-compatibility check reports the response schema 
change from TemplateData to TemplateDetailsData as a breaking OpenAPI contract 
change.

The runtime response is unchanged; the correction makes the OpenAPI schema 
match the existing TemplateDetailsData return type. Could you please advise 
whether this should be modeled in a backward-compatible way, or whether this 
intentional contract correction should be handled differently?

> OpenAPI gaps: Admin Templates
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-2830
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2830
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Aleksandar Vidakovic
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: beginner-friendly
>
> h4. /templates/template
> * GetTemplatesTemplateResponse: entity, type defined as numbers instead of 
> arrays
> h4. /templates/{id}/template
> * no defined type



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to