[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18117061#comment-18117061
]
MARAM SAI SWARAN commented on FINERACT-2830:
--------------------------------------------
Hi [~avivijay] ,
The draft PR’s API backward-compatibility check reports the response schema
change from TemplateData to TemplateDetailsData as a breaking OpenAPI contract
change.
The runtime response is unchanged; the correction makes the OpenAPI schema
match the existing TemplateDetailsData return type. Could you please advise
whether this should be modeled in a backward-compatible way, or whether this
intentional contract correction should be handled differently?
> OpenAPI gaps: Admin Templates
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-2830
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2830
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Aleksandar Vidakovic
> Priority: Major
> Labels: beginner-friendly
>
> h4. /templates/template
> * GetTemplatesTemplateResponse: entity, type defined as numbers instead of
> arrays
> h4. /templates/{id}/template
> * no defined type
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)