[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14611846#comment-14611846
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2297:
---------------------------------------
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/874#discussion_r33770569
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/SVM.scala
---
@@ -242,8 +297,17 @@ object SVM{
}
}
- override def predict(value: T, model: DenseVector): Double = {
- value.asBreeze dot model.asBreeze
+ override def predict(value: T, model: DenseVector):
+ Double = {
+
+ val rawValue = value.asBreeze dot model.asBreeze
+
+ if (outputDecisionFunction) {
+ rawValue
+ }
+ else {
--- End diff --
is this OK
```scala
override def predict(value: T, model: DenseVector): Double = {
val rawValue = value.asBreeze dot model.asBreeze
if (outputDecisionFunction) {
rawValue
}
else {
if (rawValue > thresholdValue) 1.0 else -1.0
}
}
```
> Add threshold setting for SVM binary predictions
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-2297
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2297
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Machine Learning Library
> Reporter: Theodore Vasiloudis
> Assignee: Theodore Vasiloudis
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: ML
> Fix For: 0.10
>
>
> Currently SVM outputs the raw decision function values when using the predict
> function.
> We should have instead the ability to set a threshold above which examples
> are labeled as positive (1.0) and below negative (-1.0). Then the prediction
> function can be directly used for evaluation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
