[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16707940#comment-16707940
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10543:
----------------------------------------
sunjincheng121 commented on a change in pull request #6918:
[FLINK-10543][table] Leverage efficient timer deletion in relational operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6918#discussion_r238456197
##########
File path:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/runtime/aggregate/RowTimeBoundedRangeOver.scala
##########
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ class RowTimeBoundedRangeOver(
function.retract(accumulators, retractRow)
dataListIndex += 1
}
- retractTsList.add(dataTs)
Review comment:
Remove ` val retractTsList: JList[Long] = new JArrayList[Long]`
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Leverage efficient timer deletion in relational operators
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-10543
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10543
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Reporter: Fabian Hueske
> Assignee: Hequn Cheng
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> FLINK-9423 added support for efficient timer deletions. This feature is
> available since Flink 1.6 and should be used by the relational operator of
> SQL and Table API.
> Currently, we use a few workarounds to handle situations when deleting timers
> would be the better solution.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
