becketqin commented on a change in pull request #12137:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/12137#discussion_r426112436



##########
File path: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/checkpoint/metadata/MetadataV2V3SerializerBase.java
##########
@@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ public static void serializeStreamStateHandle(
                dos.flush();
        }
 
+       @Nullable

Review comment:
       Minor: another option is to return an `Optional`. Currently we have both 
used in mix. It might be good to have a convention.

##########
File path: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/checkpoint/metadata/MetadataV2V3SerializerBase.java
##########
@@ -487,6 +488,15 @@ public static StreamStateHandle 
deserializeStreamStateHandle(DataInputStream dis
                }
        }
 
+       public static ByteStreamStateHandle 
deserializeAndCheckByteStreamStateHandle(DataInputStream dis) throws 
IOException {

Review comment:
       Nit: It seems the return value is also `Nullable`?

##########
File path: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/scheduler/DefaultScheduler.java
##########
@@ -186,10 +188,18 @@ private void maybeHandleTaskFailure(final 
TaskExecutionState taskExecutionState,
 
        private void handleTaskFailure(final ExecutionVertexID 
executionVertexId, @Nullable final Throwable error) {
                setGlobalFailureCause(error);
+               notifyCoordinatorsAboutTaskFailure(executionVertexId, error);

Review comment:
       It looks that the failover may initially restart tasks only and fall 
back to a global failover if the task-only failover encountered exception. This 
may cause the `OperatorCoordinator.subtaskFailed()` to be invoked twice 
consecutively on the same subtask. Currently `SourceCoordinator` throws an 
exception if `subtaskFailed()` is invoked on a subtask that has not been 
registered. We may need to remove that check.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to