rmetzger commented on a change in pull request #14767:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14767#discussion_r565327342
##########
File path:
flink-streaming-java/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/graph/StreamGraphGeneratorBatchExecutionTest.java
##########
@@ -105,6 +107,7 @@ public void testOneInputTransformation() {
assertThat(graph.getStateBackend(),
instanceOf(BatchExecutionStateBackend.class));
// the provider is passed as a lambda therefore we cannot assert the
class of the provider
assertThat(graph.getTimerServiceProvider(), notNullValue());
+ assertThat(graph.getJobType(), is(JobType.BATCH));
Review comment:
> I'm not really sold on this shotgun-style assertion approach.
My thinking was the following: All tests seem to assert a bunch of
assumptions (batch state backend, timer service set etc.) .. since this is the
style of the tests there, I added the BATCH job type everywhere.
I was too lazy adding a separate batch job-type test, since I assumed enough
coverage through the other change.
I will follow your suggestion.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
