[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15249747#comment-15249747
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2998:
---------------------------------------

Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1838#issuecomment-212402787
  
    Hi @gallenvara, the tests look good. I left a few comments to make the test 
code more concise.
    
    Regarding your questions:
    1) Yes, we could change the `Object[]` to Tuple. However, I am not sure if 
this would confuse users. Tuple is usually used as a data type in programs 
while in DataDistribution it would be a holder for composite keys. 
    2) The problem with returning `Tuple` from a `KeySelector` is that `Tuple` 
does not implement `Comparable` as requested by `partitionByHash` or 
`partitionByRange`. 


> Support range partition comparison for multi input nodes.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2998
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2998
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Optimizer
>            Reporter: Chengxiang Li
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The optimizer may have potential opportunity to optimize the DAG while it 
> found two input range partition are equivalent, we does not support the 
> comparison yet.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to