Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2269
  
    Not really, the reason for having an ITCase is just that they really 
exercise the sink embedded in a proper Flink job, which might bring up 
interactions that where overlooked when writing a test case. I think with 
proper test cases we could go completely without an ITCase. Which also improves 
testing time.
    
    The purpose of the `MiniDFSCluster` is to test the sink against an actual 
HDFS cluster because there is some stuff in there that would only be tested 
when using HDFS. For example, the truncate support.
    
    tl;dr Go for it and move everything to a test case. 😃 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to