fapaul commented on a change in pull request #18397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18397#discussion_r788958657
##########
File path:
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/connector/kafka/source/reader/deserializer/KafkaRecordDeserializationSchema.java
##########
@@ -123,9 +121,8 @@ default void
open(DeserializationSchema.InitializationContext context) throws Ex
* @return A {@link KafkaRecordDeserializationSchema} that deserialize the
value with the given
* deserializer.
*/
- static <V, D extends Configurable & Deserializer<V>>
- KafkaRecordDeserializationSchema<V> valueOnly(
- Class<D> valueDeserializerClass, Map<String, String>
config) {
+ static <V, D extends Deserializer<V>> KafkaRecordDeserializationSchema<V>
valueOnly(
Review comment:
@lindong28 thanks for your feedback. I am wondering a bit what the best
way here is. Removing the method seems not ideal because as you said users
might have used it with Serializers/Deserializers implementing Configurable.
In the Kafka ecosystem there seem to be different ways of configuring a
Serializer/Deserializer one is the current one with implementing Configurable
and the other is through the Serializer/Deserializer itself [1]. I am no Kafka
expert so I don't know the right way to configure them. I guess we can also
support both methods.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/3dd3f3ef035501816efac23c32d517bf62fdaa56/clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/serialization/Serializer.java#L40
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
