pnowojski commented on code in PR #20151:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/20151#discussion_r1081118070
##########
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/checkpoint/channel/ChannelStateWriteRequestExecutorImpl.java:
##########
@@ -51,27 +66,40 @@ class ChannelStateWriteRequestExecutorImpl implements
ChannelStateWriteRequestEx
private final Thread thread;
private volatile Exception thrown = null;
private volatile boolean wasClosed = false;
- private final String taskName;
+
+ private final Map<SubtaskID, Queue<ChannelStateWriteRequest>>
unreadyQueues =
+ new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
+
+ private final JobID jobID;
+ private final Set<SubtaskID> subtasks;
+ private final AtomicBoolean isRegistering = new AtomicBoolean(true);
+ private final int numberOfSubtasksShareFile;
Review Comment:
Hmmm, I'm not sure. Maybe it's sufficient to have just the interrupt. On the
other hand, does it hurt if we add the `lock.notifyAll()`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
