[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15603085#comment-15603085
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3702:
---------------------------------------
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2094#discussion_r84767836
--- Diff:
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/typeutils/CompositeType.java
---
@@ -265,16 +265,6 @@ public boolean hasDeterministicFieldOrder() {
@PublicEvolving
public abstract int getFieldIndex(String fieldName);
- @PublicEvolving
- public static class InvalidFieldReferenceException extends
IllegalArgumentException {
--- End diff --
I would not move this exception.
It is not strictly required and causes many necessary changes.
> DataStream API PojoFieldAccessor doesn't support nested POJOs
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3702
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3702
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: DataStream API
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Robert Metzger
> Assignee: Gabor Gevay
>
> The {{PojoFieldAccessor}} (which is used by {{.sum(String)}} and similar
> methods) doesn't support nested POJOs right now.
> As part of FLINK-3697 I'll add a check for a nested POJO and fail with an
> exception.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
