RocMarshal commented on code in PR #23635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23635#discussion_r1390096271
##########
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/TaskManagerOptions.java:
##########
@@ -708,6 +711,60 @@ public class TaskManagerOptions {
"Time we wait for the timers in milliseconds to
finish all pending timer threads"
+ " when the stream task is cancelled.");
+ @Documentation.Section({
+ Documentation.Sections.EXPERT_SCHEDULING,
+ Documentation.Sections.ALL_TASK_MANAGER
+ })
+ public static final ConfigOption<TaskManagerLoadBalanceMode>
TASK_MANAGER_LOAD_BALANCE_MODE =
+ ConfigOptions.key("taskmanager.load-balance.mode")
+ .enumType(TaskManagerLoadBalanceMode.class)
+ .defaultValue(TaskManagerLoadBalanceMode.NONE)
+ .withDescription(
+ Description.builder()
+ .text(
+ "Mode for the load-balance
allocation strategy across all available %s.",
+ code("TaskManagers"))
+ .list(
+ text(
+ "The %s mode tries to
spread out the slots evenly across all available %s.",
+
code(TaskManagerLoadBalanceMode.SLOTS.name()),
+ code("TaskManagers")),
+ text(
+ "The %s mode tries to
ensure that the number of tasks is relative balanced across all available %s.",
Review Comment:
hi, @1996fanrui
Thanks for your review.
Based on the results of the
[discussion](https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23635#discussion_r1383243917).
The `TASKS` enumeration and its description will be temporarily removed, and
after the entire function is completed, they will be reintroduced(with
addressed your comments) to ensure consistency between the function and the
document.
WDYT?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
