1996fanrui commented on code in PR #721:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/721#discussion_r1412210561


##########
flink-kubernetes-operator/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/operator/reconciler/deployment/AbstractFlinkResourceReconciler.java:
##########
@@ -180,13 +190,28 @@ public void reconcile(FlinkResourceContext<CR> ctx) 
throws Exception {
         }
     }
 
-    private void applyAutoscaler(FlinkResourceContext<CR> ctx) throws 
Exception {
+    private void applyAutoscaler(FlinkResourceContext<CR> ctx, @Nullable 
String existingOverrides)
+            throws Exception {
         var autoScalerCtx = ctx.getJobAutoScalerContext();
         boolean autoscalerEnabled =
                 ctx.getResource().getSpec().getJob() != null
                         && 
ctx.getObserveConfig().getBoolean(AUTOSCALER_ENABLED);
         autoScalerCtx.getConfiguration().set(AUTOSCALER_ENABLED, 
autoscalerEnabled);
+
         autoscaler.scale(autoScalerCtx);

Review Comment:
   If I understand correct. The root cause is the logic related to `boolean 
specChanged` in `AbstractFlinkResourceReconciler#reconcile`. The `specChanged` 
will be true, when the ordering of the parallelism overrides is changed. And 
operator will scale job.
   
   Right?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to