[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15701727#comment-15701727
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5026:
---------------------------------------
Github user kl0u commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2788#discussion_r89762073
--- Diff:
flink-streaming-scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/scala/ConnectedStreams.scala
---
@@ -101,30 +101,31 @@ class ConnectedStreams[IN1, IN2](javaStream:
JavaCStream[IN1, IN2]) {
}
/**
- * Applies the given [[TimelyCoFlatMapFunction]] on the connected input
streams,
+ * Applies the given [[CoProcessFunction]] on the connected input
streams,
* thereby creating a transformed output stream.
*
* The function will be called for every element in the streams and can
produce
* zero or more output. The function can also query the time and set
timers. When
* reacting to the firing of set timers the function can emit yet more
elements.
*
- * A
[[org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.co.RichTimelyCoFlatMapFunction]]
+ * A [[RichCoProcessFunction]]
* can be used to gain access to features provided by the
* [[org.apache.flink.api.common.functions.RichFunction]] interface.
*
- * @param coFlatMapper The [[TimelyCoFlatMapFunction]] that is called
for each element
- * in the stream.
- *
+ * @param coProcessFunction The [[CoProcessFunction]] that is called for
each element
+ * in the stream.
* @return The transformed { @link DataStream}.
--- End diff --
The transformed [[DataStream]].
> Rename TimelyFlatMap to Process
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-5026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5026
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Streaming
> Reporter: Aljoscha Krettek
> Assignee: Aljoscha Krettek
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> The method on {{KeyedDataStream}} would be called {{process()}} and the
> function itself would be called {{ProcessFunction}}.
> The reason for this is that {{TimelyFlatMapFunction}} is a bit of a mouthful
> and with the additions to the timer API and state the {{ProcessFunction}}
> could become the basic, low-level, user-facing API for cases where users
> nowadays implement their own operator.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
