[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15853590#comment-15853590
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5406:
---------------------------------------

Github user godfreyhe commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3101#discussion_r99524112
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/calcite/RuleSetConfig.scala
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.flink.table.calcite
    +
    +import org.apache.calcite.plan.RelOptRule
    +import org.apache.calcite.tools.{RuleSet, RuleSets}
    +import org.apache.flink.util.Preconditions
    +
    +import scala.collection.JavaConverters._
    +
    +/**
    +  * Builder for creating a RuleSet configuration.
    +  */
    +class RuleSetConfigBuilder {
    --- End diff --
    
    If we integrate` RuleSetConfigBuilder` in `CalciteConfigBuilder`, It's 
better we integrate `RuleSetConfig` in `CalciteConfig` too ? If we want to add 
another kind of `RuleSet` in future, both `RuleSetConfig` and 
`CalciteConfigBuilder`  are need to change. Previously, I want to keep 
`CalciteConfig` and `CalciteConfigBuilder` stable. 


> add normalization phase for predicate logical plan rewriting between 
> decorrelate query phase and volcano optimization phase
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5406
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5406
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: godfrey he
>            Assignee: godfrey he
>
> Normalization phase is for predicate logical plan rewriting and is 
> independent of cost module. The rules in normalization phase do not need to 
> repeatedly applied to different logical plan which is different to volcano 
> optimization phase. And the benefit of normalization phase is to reduce the 
> running time of volcano planner.
> *ReduceExpressionsRule* can apply various simplifying transformations on 
> RexNode trees. Currently, there are two transformations:
> 1) Constant reduction, which evaluates constant subtrees, replacing them with 
> a corresponding RexLiteral
> 2) Removal of redundant casts, which occurs when the argument into the cast 
> is the same as the type of the resulting cast expression
> the above transformations do not depend on the cost module,  so we can move 
> the rules in *ReduceExpressionsRule* from 
> DATASET_OPT_RULES/DATASTREAM_OPT_RULES to DataSet/DataStream Normalization 
> Rules.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to