Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3358#discussion_r102180098
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-connectors/flink-connector-elasticsearch-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/elasticsearch/ElasticsearchSinkBase.java
 ---
    @@ -165,20 +286,36 @@ public void beforeBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest 
request) { }
                                @Override
                                public void afterBulk(long executionId, 
BulkRequest request, BulkResponse response) {
                                        if (response.hasFailures()) {
    -                                           for (BulkItemResponse itemResp 
: response.getItems()) {
    -                                                   Throwable failure = 
callBridge.extractFailureCauseFromBulkItemResponse(itemResp);
    +                                           BulkItemResponse itemResponse;
    +                                           Throwable failure;
    +
    +                                           for (int i = 0; i < 
response.getItems().length; i++) {
    +                                                   itemResponse = 
response.getItems()[i];
    +                                                   failure = 
callBridge.extractFailureCauseFromBulkItemResponse(itemResponse);
                                                        if (failure != null) {
    -                                                           
LOG.error("Failed Elasticsearch item request: {}", failure.getMessage(), 
failure);
    -                                                           
failureThrowable.compareAndSet(null, failure);
    +                                                           
LOG.error("Failed Elasticsearch item request: {}", 
itemResponse.getFailureMessage(), failure);
    +
    +                                                           if 
(failureHandler.onFailure(request.requests().get(i), failure, requestIndexer)) {
    --- End diff --
    
    I wonder if it would be better if the `onFailure` method would not return a 
boolean but throw a Throwable?
    This way users have more flexibility in implementing their failure handler.
    
    For example if a failure handler is doing three retries and fails 
afterwards, the original exception will be thrown. If the `onFailure()` method 
can throw their own exception, you can throw a custom exception that tells the 
user about the three retries.
    
    We can definitively discuss this because this change is annoying to do 
(docs & javadocs need to be updated).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to