[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16054935#comment-16054935
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-3073:
---------------------------------------

Github user PurelyApplied commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/591#discussion_r122848531
  
    --- Diff: 
geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/query/internal/CompiledSelect.java
 ---
    @@ -1415,11 +1413,7 @@ public boolean evaluateCq(ExecutionContext context) 
throws FunctionDomainExcepti
             // add UNDEFINED to results only for NOT EQUALS queries
             if (this.whereClause.getType() == COMPARISON) {
               int operator = ((Filter) this.whereClause).getOperator();
    -          if ((operator != TOK_NE && operator != TOK_NE_ALT)) {
    -            return false;
    -          } else {
    -            return true;
    -          }
    +          return !(operator != TOK_NE && operator != TOK_NE_ALT);
    --- End diff --
    
    That's a lot of negatives.  `return operator == TOK_NE || operator == 
TOK_NE_ALT` reads a lot better to me.


> Refactor/rename OrderByComparatorUnmapped
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-3073
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3073
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: querying
>            Reporter: Emily Yeh
>            Assignee: Emily Yeh
>
> It would make more sense to rename {{OrderByComparatorUnmapped.java}} to 
> {{OrderByComparatorMapped.java}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to