[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13731141#comment-13731141
]
Himanshu Vashishtha commented on HBASE-8348:
--------------------------------------------
And yes, I agree with disabled table getting enabled in 0.96; I think it is
okay if we doc that the table which are disabled in 0.94.x, might get enabled
on migration. And, users could disable them once the migration is done. What do
you think Rajeshbabu?
> Polish the migration to 0.96
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8348
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8348
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.95.0
> Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> Assignee: rajeshbabu
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.95.2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-8348_trunk.patch, HBASE-8348_trunk_v2.patch
>
>
> Currently, migration works but there's still a couple of rough edges:
> - HBASE-8045 finished the .META. migration but didn't remove ROOT, so it's
> still on the filesystem.
> - Data in ZK needs to be removed manually. Either we fix up the data in ZK
> or we delete it ourselves.
> - TestMetaMigrationRemovingHTD has a testMetaUpdatedFlagInROOT method, but
> ROOT is gone now.
> Elliott was also mentioning that we could have "hbase migrate" do the HFileV1
> checks, clear ZK, remove ROOT, etc.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
