[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13782205#comment-13782205
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-9612:
-------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in hbase-0.96-hadoop2 #65 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.96-hadoop2/65/])
HBASE-9612 Ability to batch edits destined to different regions (stack: rev 
1527687)
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/ClientSmallScanner.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HBaseAdmin.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTable.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/MultiServerCallable.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/ScannerCallable.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/ipc/PayloadCarryingRpcController.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/ipc/RpcClient.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/protobuf/ProtobufUtil.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/protobuf/RequestConverter.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/protobuf/ResponseConverter.java
* /hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-protocol/README.txt
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/protobuf/generated/ClientProtos.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/protobuf/generated/RPCProtos.java
* /hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-protocol/src/main/protobuf/Client.proto
* /hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-protocol/src/main/protobuf/RPC.proto
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegion.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/QosFunction.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/wal/WALEditsReplaySink.java
* 
/hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/TestQosFunction.java


> Ability to batch edits destined to different regions
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9612
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9612
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.95.0, 0.95.1, 0.95.2, 0.96.0
>            Reporter: Benoit Sigoure
>            Assignee: stack
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: 9612.096.v5.txt, 9612v2.txt, 9612v3.txt, 9612v4.txt, 
> 9612v5.txt, 9612.wip.txt
>
>
> The old (pre-PB) "multi" and "multiPut" RPCs allowed one to batch edits 
> destined to different regions.  Seems like we've lost this ability after the 
> switch to protobufs.
> The {{MultiRequest}} only contains one {{RegionSpecifier}}, and a list of 
> {{MultiAction}}.  The {{MultiAction}} message is contains either a single 
> {{MutationProto}} or a {{Get}} (but not both – so its name is misleading as 
> there is nothing "multi" about it).  Also it seems redundant with 
> {{MultiGetRequest}}, I'm not sure what's the point of supporting {{Get}} in 
> {{MultiAction}}.
> I propose that we change {{MultiRequest}} to be a just a list of 
> {{MultiAction}}, and {{MultiAction}} will contain the {{RegionSpecifier}}, 
> the {{bool atomic}} and a list of {{MutationProto}}.  This would be a 
> non-backward compatible protobuf change.
> If we want we can support mixing edits and reads, in which case we'd also add 
> a list of {{Get}} in {{MultiAction}}, and we'd have support having both that 
> list and the list of {{MutationProto}} set at the same time.  But this is a 
> bonus and can be done later (in a backward compatible manner, hence no need 
> to rush on this one).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to