[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13974094#comment-13974094 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10934: ----------------------------------- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12640818/HBASE_10934_4.patch against trunk revision . ATTACHMENT ID: 12640818 {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. {color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9332//console This message is automatically generated. > Provide HBaseAdminInterface to abstract HBaseAdmin > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-10934 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10934 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Client > Reporter: Carter > Priority: Blocker > Labels: patch > Fix For: 0.99.0 > > Attachments: HBASE_10934.patch, HBASE_10934_2.patch, > HBASE_10934_3.patch, HBASE_10934_4.patch > > > As HBaseAdmin is essentially the administrative API, it would seem to follow > Java best practices to provide an interface to access it instead of requiring > applications to use the raw object. > I am proposing (and would be happy to develop): > * A new interface, HBaseAdminInterface, that captures the signatures of the > API (HBaseAdmin will implement this interface) > * A new method, HConnection.getHBaseAdmin(), that returns an instance of the > interface -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)