[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14025785#comment-14025785
]
Francis Liu commented on HBASE-11059:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
The reason we need HBASE-10569 is that the patch talks to the meta region
directly in persisting region state changes. If meta is on a different server,
the performance shouldn't be the same. The new deployment is used in my
testing. But the original deployment is still supported, with some performance
hurt of course.
{quote}
I see so it will still work with meta remotely access. IMHO I don't think the
perf degradation will be significant, though would be good to quantify.
> ZK-less region assignment
> -------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11059
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11059
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: master, Region Assignment
> Reporter: Jimmy Xiang
> Assignee: Jimmy Xiang
> Fix For: 0.99.0
>
> Attachments: hbase-11059.patch, hbase-11059_v2.1.patch,
> hbase-11059_v2.patch, zk-less_am.pdf
>
>
> It seems that most people don't like region assignment with ZK (HBASE-5487),
> which causes many uncertainties. This jira is to support ZK-less region
> assignment. We need to make sure this patch doesn't break backward
> compatibility/rolling upgrade.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
