[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14109229#comment-14109229 ]
Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-11610: ----------------------------------------- bq. threadLocal HTable ), it is ~5% slower Ah, ok. It's a little bit strange actually. But not big enough to delay the patch. bq. done with 10 HConnections I see. Then let's keep it. bq. will use the single pool managed by MultiHConnection I haven't checked in the code, but it seems you're right. bq. how about hbase.multihconnection.threads.max as the pool is part of MultiHconnection? No strong opinion. As you like for me. +1 for the patch, as the remaining it pure nit. > Enhance remote meta updates > --------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-11610 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11610 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Jimmy Xiang > Assignee: Virag Kothari > Attachments: HBASE-11610.patch, HBASE-11610_2.patch, > HBASE-11610_v3.patch > > > Currently, if the meta region is on a regionserver instead of the master, > meta update is synchronized on one HTable instance. We should be able to do > better. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)