[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13109022#comment-13109022
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-4448:
------------------------------

How would we pass this factory for test to test?

How is this different from a fat class of tests that has a @Before that spins 
up the cluster and then an @After to shut it down as TestAdmin or 
TestFromClientSide do currently?

> HBaseTestingUtilityFactory - pattern for re-using HBaseTestingUtility 
> instances across unit tests
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-4448
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4448
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Doug Meil
>            Assignee: Doug Meil
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HBaseTestingUtilityFactory.java
>
>
> Setting up and tearing down HBaseTestingUtility instances in unit tests is 
> very expensive.  On my MacBook it takes about 10 seconds to set up a 
> MiniCluster, and 7 seconds to tear it down.  When multiplied by the number of 
> test classes that use this facility, that's a lot of time in the build.
> This factory assumes that the JVM is being re-used across test classes in the 
> build, otherwise this pattern won't work. 
> I don't think this is appropriate for every use, but I think it can be 
> applicable in a great many cases - especially where developers just want a 
> simple MiniCluster with 1 slave.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to