[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13109075#comment-13109075
]
Jesse Yates commented on HBASE-4448:
------------------------------------
I think that these tests would be run all in the same jvm (non-forked mode) -
that way they can all reuse the same static testing util.
Running it in forked mode really wouldn't help with this issue. How sure how
running in parallel is actually managed - I'm assuming its all out of the same
jvm, just on different threads. Using the cluster the proposed way would again
be a win.
> HBaseTestingUtilityFactory - pattern for re-using HBaseTestingUtility
> instances across unit tests
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4448
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4448
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Doug Meil
> Assignee: Doug Meil
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HBaseTestingUtilityFactory.java
>
>
> Setting up and tearing down HBaseTestingUtility instances in unit tests is
> very expensive. On my MacBook it takes about 10 seconds to set up a
> MiniCluster, and 7 seconds to tear it down. When multiplied by the number of
> test classes that use this facility, that's a lot of time in the build.
> This factory assumes that the JVM is being re-used across test classes in the
> build, otherwise this pattern won't work.
> I don't think this is appropriate for every use, but I think it can be
> applicable in a great many cases - especially where developers just want a
> simple MiniCluster with 1 slave.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
