[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14368268#comment-14368268
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-13262:
----------------------------------------
bq. This approach wouldn't break 0.98 clients against 1.x; however, it also
wouldn't address the underlying problem of the client guessing at what to do
based on the characteristics of the {{Result[]}} when it is unaware of the
existence of this new field in the protobuf. Given my understanding of the
problem, 0.98 clients running against 1.x *could* see this problem, although I
have not tested that to confirm it happens.
Wire compatibility and a default configuration in 1.0.x that mitigates the
problem until a rolling upgrade is completed could be good enough. Additional
comment reserved until you come back with results from more digging.
> ResultScanner doesn't return all rows in Scan
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13262
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13262
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
> Environment: Single node, pseduo-distributed 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
> Attachments: testrun_0.98.txt, testrun_branch1.0.txt
>
>
> Tried to write a simple Java client again 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
> * Write 1M rows, each row with 1 family, and 10 qualifiers (values [0-9]),
> for a total of 10M cells written
> * Read back the data from the table, ensure I saw 10M cells
> Running it against {{04ac1891}} (and earlier) yesterday, I would get ~20% of
> the actual rows. Running against 1.0.0, returns all 10M records as expected.
> [Code I was
> running|https://github.com/joshelser/hbase-hwhat/blob/master/src/main/java/hbase/HBaseTest.java]
> for the curious.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
