[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14521645#comment-14521645
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-13579:
-------------------------------

[~ram_krish] Add to branch-1. Probably inappropriate for 0.98.

> Avoid isCellTTLExpired() for NO-TAG cases
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13579
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13579
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Scanners
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>         Attachments: HBASE-13579_1.patch, HBASE-13579_2.patch, 
> HBASE-13579_KVExtension.patch, HBASE-13579_storelevel.patch
>
>
> As observed in this JIRA's performance test, we are always calling the 
> isCellTTLExpired() for every cell and internally it is parsing the keyLength, 
> valueLength() to get the tagsLength after which we decide whether Cell level 
> TTL is present are not.
> This JIRA aims to avoid this check if all the readers of the storescanner 
> knows that there are no tags to read.  Note that, for the memstore scanner we 
> will do that in another JIRA, which I suppose Stack had already raised to 
> avoid tag length while flushing (for the NO-TAG) case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to