[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642559#comment-14642559 ]
stack commented on HBASE-14063: ------------------------------- Should ByteBufferedKeyOnlyKeyValue be called ByteBufferedKey? Or ByteBufferKey. The former is a mouthful. Could be done in a followup issue. Is this for serialization only? 40 public ByteBufferedKeyOnlyKeyValue() { 41 } Add a comment if so on commit. Why we have to have a OffheapKeyValue? What makes it different from a KV other than the assert that it is backed by direct bytebuffer? This is threadsafe? Won't have two threads concurrently trying to do this? bufBackedKeyOnlyKv.setKey(pair.getFirst(), pair.getSecond(), klen); > Use BufferBackedCell in read path after HBASE-12213 and HBASE-12295 > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-14063 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14063 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: regionserver, Scanners > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-14063.patch, HBASE-14063_1.patch, > HBASE-14063_3.patch, HBASE-14063_final.patch > > > Subtask to ensure that the BytebufferBackedCell gets used in the read path > after HBASE-12213 and HBASE-12295 goes in. This would help to clearly change > the required places and makes the review easier. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)