[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14647311#comment-14647311
]
stack commented on HBASE-14063:
-------------------------------
bq. OffheapKV extends ByteBufferedCell, that is the main difference between
this and the normal KV. So this KV will have the new APIs in ByteBufferedCell
for referring to the BB underlying these cells.
Naming a class 'Offheap' when backed by a BB which could be on or off heap
seems incorrect. The implemenation is offheap only?
> Use BufferBackedCell in read path after HBASE-12213 and HBASE-12295
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14063
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14063
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: regionserver, Scanners
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-14063.patch, HBASE-14063_1.patch,
> HBASE-14063_3.patch, HBASE-14063_4.patch, HBASE-14063_final.patch
>
>
> Subtask to ensure that the BytebufferBackedCell gets used in the read path
> after HBASE-12213 and HBASE-12295 goes in. This would help to clearly change
> the required places and makes the review easier.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
