[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14904957#comment-14904957 ]
Elliott Clark commented on HBASE-14460: --------------------------------------- Why don't we try what I was suggesting for the first? And hold the locks per row until after the sync. Then there's no need to ever call waitForRead before starting the check and mutate type operations. > [Perf Regression] Merge of MVCC and SequenceId (HBASE-HBASE-8763) slowed > Increments, CheckAndPuts, batch operations > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-14460 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Performance > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Priority: Critical > Attachments: 14460.txt, region_lock.png > > > As reported by 鈴木俊裕 up on the mailing list -- see "Performance degradation > between CDH5.3.1(HBase0.98.6) and CDH5.4.5(HBase1.0.0)" -- our unification of > sequenceid and MVCC slows Increments (and other ops) as the mvcc needs to > 'catch up' to our current point before we can read the last Increment value > that we need to update. > We can say that our Increment is just done wrong, we should just be writing > Increments and summing on read, but checkAndPut as well as batching > operations have the same issue. Fix. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)