[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15085323#comment-15085323 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-15027: ----------------------------------- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12780675/HBASE-15027_5.patch against master branch at commit 073e00c0053cb351dbba265112a6e756c932f875. ATTACHMENT ID: 12780675 {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 24 new or modified tests. {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all supported hadoop versions (2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.6.1 2.7.0 2.7.1) {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 protoc{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of protoc compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. {color:red}-1 checkstyle{color}. The applied patch generated new checkstyle errors. Check build console for list of new errors. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}. The patch introduces the following lines longer than 100: + "Exception while trying to close and archive the comapcted store files of the store " + String string = org.apache.hadoop.hbase.executor.EventType.RS_COMPACTED_FILES_DISCHARGER.toString(); + List<RegionServerThread> regionServerThreads = TEST_UTIL.getHBaseCluster().getRegionServerThreads(); + CompactedHFilesDischarger cleaner = new CompactedHFilesDischarger(100, null, rs.getRegionServer()); {color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn post-site goal succeeds with this patch. {color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in . {color:green}+1 zombies{color}. No zombie tests found running at the end of the build. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/17139//testReport/ Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/17139//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle Errors: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/17139//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/17139//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor the way the CompactedHFileDischarger threads are created > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-15027 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15027 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-15027.patch, HBASE-15027_1.patch, > HBASE-15027_2.patch, HBASE-15027_3.patch, HBASE-15027_3.patch, > HBASE-15027_4.patch, HBASE-15027_5.patch > > > As per suggestion given over in HBASE-14970, if we need to create a single > thread pool service for the CompactionHFileDischarger we need to create an > exectuor service in the RegionServer level and create discharger handler > threads (Event handlers) and pass the Event to the new Exectuor service that > we create for the compaction hfiles discharger. What should be the default > number of threads here? If a HRS holds 100 of regions - will 10 threads be > enough? This issue will try to resolve this with tests and discussions and > suitable patch will be updated in HBASE-14970 for branch-1 once this is > committed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)