[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15184301#comment-15184301
]
Jesse Yates commented on HBASE-14703:
-------------------------------------
My understanding was that, _as a project_ we were not backporting features past
an upstream branch point. So, if an upstream RM didn't want it, then the
downstream shouldn't get it. IIRC, that came up for the client push back the
first time around (but I'm probably thinking of another JIRA). Seeing as none
of the other upstream RMs had weighed in, I took Sean's comments as what was
expected to go in... he still RM'ing 1.2 line, yes?
My apologies that I'm not up on the latest guidelines, as was going on previous
discussions I had been involved with. You are still getting your code Mr.
Purtell :)
> HTable.mutateRow does not collect stats
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14703
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14703
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Heng Chen
> Assignee: Heng Chen
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-14702_v5.2_addendum-addendum.patch,
> HBASE-14703-5.2-addendum.patch, HBASE-14703-async.patch,
> HBASE-14703-start.patch, HBASE-14703-v4.1.patch, HBASE-14703-v4.patch,
> HBASE-14703-v6_with-check-and-mutate.patch, HBASE-14703.patch,
> HBASE-14703_v1.patch, HBASE-14703_v10.patch, HBASE-14703_v10.patch,
> HBASE-14703_v11.patch, HBASE-14703_v12.patch, HBASE-14703_v13.patch,
> HBASE-14703_v2.patch, HBASE-14703_v3.patch, HBASE-14703_v5.1.patch,
> HBASE-14703_v5.2.patch, HBASE-14703_v5.patch, HBASE-14703_v6-addendum.patch,
> HBASE-14703_v6.patch, HBASE-14703_v7.patch, HBASE-14703_v8.patch,
> HBASE-14703_v9.patch
>
>
> We are trying to fix the stats implementation, by moving it out of the Result
> object and into an Rpc payload (but not the 'cell payload', just as part of
> the values returned from the request). This change will also us use easily
> switch to AsyncProcess as the executor, and support stats, for nearly all the
> rpc calls. However, that means when you upgrade the client or server, you
> will lose stats visibility until the other side is upgraded. We could keep
> around the Result based stats storage to accommodate the old api and send
> both stats back from the server (in each result and in the rpc payload).
> Note that we will still be wire compatible - protobufs mean we can just ride
> over the lack of information.
> The other tricky part of this is that Result has a
> non-InterfaceAudience.Private getStatistics() method (along with two
> InterfaceAudience.Private addResults and setStatistics methods), so we might
> need a release to deprecate the getStats() method before throwing it out?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
