[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Appy updated HBASE-15965:
-------------------------
    Description: 
Testing by executing a command will cover the exact path users will trigger, so 
its better then directly calling library functions in tests. Changing the tests 
to use @shell.command(:<command>, args) to execute them like it's a command 
coming from shell.

Norm change:
Commands should print the output user would like to see, but in the end, should 
also return the relevant value. This way:
- Tests can use returned value to check that functionality works
- Tests can capture stdout to assert particular kind of output user should see.
- We do not print the return value in interactive mode and keep the output 
clean. See Shell.command() function.

Bugs found due to this change:
- Uncovered bug in major_compact.rb with this approach. It was calling 
admin.majorCompact() which doesn't exist but our tests didn't catch it since 
they directly tested admin.major_compact()
- Enabled TestReplicationShell. If it's bad, flaky infra will take care of it.

  was:
    - Changes tests to use @shell.command(:<command>, args) instead of directly 
using functions in admin.rb, etc.
    - Testing by executing a command will cover the exact path users will 
trigger, so its better testing compared to just testing library functions.
    - Uncovered bug in major_compact.rb with this approach. It was calling 
admin.majorCompact() which doesn't exist but our tests didn't catch it since 
they directly tested admin.major_compact()


> Shell test changes. Use @shell.command instead directly calling functions in 
> admin.rb and other libraries.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15965
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Appy
>            Assignee: Appy
>         Attachments: HBASE-15965.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-15965.master.002.patch, HBASE-15965.master.003.patch
>
>
> Testing by executing a command will cover the exact path users will trigger, 
> so its better then directly calling library functions in tests. Changing the 
> tests to use @shell.command(:<command>, args) to execute them like it's a 
> command coming from shell.
> Norm change:
> Commands should print the output user would like to see, but in the end, 
> should also return the relevant value. This way:
> - Tests can use returned value to check that functionality works
> - Tests can capture stdout to assert particular kind of output user should 
> see.
> - We do not print the return value in interactive mode and keep the output 
> clean. See Shell.command() function.
> Bugs found due to this change:
> - Uncovered bug in major_compact.rb with this approach. It was calling 
> admin.majorCompact() which doesn't exist but our tests didn't catch it since 
> they directly tested admin.major_compact()
> - Enabled TestReplicationShell. If it's bad, flaky infra will take care of it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to