[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15693814#comment-15693814
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-17174:
--------------------------------
{code}
204 terminated = this.pool.awaitTermination(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
{code}
How about calling pool.shutdowNow() in the case of timeout ?
Is there some statistics showing the benefit of this change ?
Thanks
> Use shared threadpool in BufferedMutatorImpl
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17174
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17174
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai
> Assignee: ChiaPing Tsai
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17174.v0.patch, HBASE-17174.v1.patch
>
>
> A update-heavy application, for example, loader, creates many BufferedMutator
> for batch updates. But these BufferedMutators can’t share a large threadpool
> because the shutdown() method will be called when closing any
> BufferedMutator. This patch adds a flag into BufferedMutatorParams for
> preventing calling the shutdown() method in BufferedMutatorImpl#close
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
