[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13179216#comment-13179216
 ] 

Akash Ashok commented on HBASE-4224:
------------------------------------

Agreed Ted. But on the client side the method is still the same. Considering 
your concern regarding async flushes

"For #1 above, I think we should keep the current behavior. People may have 
become dependent on the current behavior."

This behavior would change for table flushes too. Earlier they were sync 
flushes, now they becomes async if we remove Future.get().

This was the reason why I revisited this issue.
                
> Need a flush by regionserver rather than by table option
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-4224
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4224
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: shell
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: Akash Ashok
>         Attachments: HBase-4224-v2.patch, HBase-4224.patch
>
>
> This evening needed to clean out logs on the cluster.  logs are by 
> regionserver.  to let go of logs, we need to have all edits emptied from 
> memory.  only flush is by table or region.  We need to be able to flush the 
> regionserver.  Need to add this.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to