[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16291427#comment-16291427
]
Appy commented on HBASE-18838:
------------------------------
bq. Nope. What's going on here is that maven exclusions in modules overwrite
the exclusions in the parent, they are not additive. So by removing the htrace
exclusion here, we get to use the full exclusion list from parent pom.
(╯°□°）╯
[~stack] mentioned same thing on HBASE-19349 [in this
comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19349?focusedCommentId=16282697&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16282697].
What about this
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10734565/effect-of-overriding-exclusions-in-maven-dependency?
{quote}
bq. patch is adding lines with 0 indent.
will take a look and fix this.
{quote}
Sorry, git patch viewer CSS issue.
{quote}
bq. Since you introduced shaded.prefix
I was debating this, will go ahead and do it since you asked nicely.
{quote}
Gracias.
{quote}
bq. Add a separate exclusion, jic.
it doesn't show up in the maven dep tree, I think we're ok.
{quote}
had same weirdness up in HBASE-19349. Not in dep tree, but present in binary
tarball.
> shaded artifacts are incorrect when built against hadoop 3
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18838
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18838
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-3
> Reporter: Sean Busbey
> Assignee: Mike Drob
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-1
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18838-WIP.v2.patch, HBASE-18838.WIP.patch,
> HBASE-18838.v3.patch
>
>
> Building master/branch-2 against the hadoop-3 profile results in
> check-invariants screaming about unrelocated dependencies. will list details
> in comment.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
