[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16487572#comment-16487572 ]
Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-20478: ------------------------------------- here's checkstyle from run #2: https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-20478/3/artifact/output-general/diff-checkstyle-root.txt Do we expect to see failures from the new check included? > move import checks from hbaseanti to checkstyle > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-20478 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20478 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Sean Busbey > Assignee: Mike Drob > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HBASE-20478.0.patch, HBASE-20478.1.patch, > HBASE-20478.2.patch, HBASE-20478.3.patch, HBASE-20478.4.patch, > HBASE-20478.WIP.2.patch, HBASE-20478.WIP.2.patch, HBASE-20478.WIP.patch, > HBASE-anti-check.patch > > > came up in discussion on HBASE-20332. our check of "don't do this" things in > the codebase doesn't log the specifics of complaints anywhere, which forces > those who want to follow up to reverse engineer the check. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)