[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ted Yu updated HBASE-5542:
--------------------------

    Comment: was deleted

(was: -1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12517843/HBASE-5542.D2217.6.patch
  against trunk revision .

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests.

    -1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated -120 warning 
messages.

    +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

    -1 findbugs.  The patch appears to introduce 158 new Findbugs (version 
1.3.9) warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

     -1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestServerCustomProtocol

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1156//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1156//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1156//console

This message is automatically generated.)
    
> Unify HRegion.mutateRowsWithLocks() and HRegion.processRow()
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5542
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5542
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Scott Chen
>            Assignee: Scott Chen
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-5542.D2217.1.patch, HBASE-5542.D2217.2.patch, 
> HBASE-5542.D2217.3.patch, HBASE-5542.D2217.4.patch, HBASE-5542.D2217.5.patch, 
> HBASE-5542.D2217.6.patch, HBASE-5542.D2217.7.patch
>
>
> mutateRowsWithLocks() does atomic mutations on multiple rows.
> processRow() does atomic read-modify-writes on a single row.
> It will be useful to generalize both and have a
> processRowsWithLocks() that does atomic read-modify-writes on multiple rows.
> This also helps reduce some redundancy in the codes.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to