[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13227665#comment-13227665
]
Phabricator commented on HBASE-5542:
------------------------------------
lhofhansl has commented on the revision "HBASE-5542 [jira] Unify
HRegion.mutateRowsWithLocks() and HRegion.processRow()".
@Scott: Yes, let's use another jira for doMiniBatchPut.
For the timebound logic, at the very least there has to be an option to not
do that for mutateRowsWithLocks, as spawning another thread for that would be
too expensive.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.facebook.net/D2217
> Unify HRegion.mutateRowsWithLocks() and HRegion.processRow()
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5542
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5542
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Scott Chen
> Assignee: Scott Chen
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-5542.D2217.1.patch, HBASE-5542.D2217.2.patch,
> HBASE-5542.D2217.3.patch, HBASE-5542.D2217.4.patch, HBASE-5542.D2217.5.patch,
> HBASE-5542.D2217.6.patch, HBASE-5542.D2217.7.patch
>
>
> mutateRowsWithLocks() does atomic mutations on multiple rows.
> processRow() does atomic read-modify-writes on a single row.
> It will be useful to generalize both and have a
> processRowsWithLocks() that does atomic read-modify-writes on multiple rows.
> This also helps reduce some redundancy in the codes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
