[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233937#comment-13233937
]
stack commented on HBASE-5548:
------------------------------
You pass in the shell instance now instead of formatter when we create a table
instance. Do we get the formatter to use from the shell?
For the help, we print out a tail 'Access an HTable....' every time whatever
the help asked for. Is this right? Should we only print out this 'Access an
HTable....' stuff if nothing is passed to the table help method?
{code}
+ # here where is the IRB namespace
+ # this method just adds the call to the specified command
{code}
The above comment doesn't run right?
Otherwise, patch looks good (I think -- smile). Let me try it.
> Add ability to get a table in the shell
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5548
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5548
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: shell
> Reporter: Jesse Yates
> Assignee: Jesse Yates
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: ruby_HBASE-5528-v0.patch, ruby_HBASE-5548-v1.patch,
> ruby_HBASE-5548-v2.patch
>
>
> Currently, all the commands that operate on a table in the shell first have
> to take the table as name as input.
> There are two main considerations:
> * It is annoying to have to write the table name every time, when you should
> just be able to get a reference to a table
> * the current implementation is very wasteful - it creates a new HTable for
> each call (but reuses the connection since it uses the same configuration)
> We should be able to get a handle to a single HTable and then operate on that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
