[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13241043#comment-13241043
 ] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5617:
-----------------------------------------------

@Stack
I will be adding test cases for the rollback scenarios.  I wanted to get the 
things clarified before giving a patch.
                
> Provide coprocessor hooks in put flow while rollbackMemstore.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5617
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5617
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: coprocessors
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-5617_1.patch
>
>
> With coprocessors hooks while put happens we have the provision to create new 
> puts to other tables or regions.  These puts can be done with writeToWal as 
> false.
> In 0.94 and above the puts are first written to memstore and then to WAL.  If 
> any failure in the WAL append or sync the memstore is rollbacked.  
> Now the problem is that if the put that happens in the main flow fails there 
> is no way to rollback the 
> puts that happened in the prePut.
> We can add coprocessor hooks to like pre/postRoolBackMemStore.  Is any one 
> hook enough here?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to