[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13243022#comment-13243022
]
Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HBASE-5536:
--------------------------------------------
What is the final result of this voting?
I am thinking that, we should not access any non exposed APIs from HDFS at
least from this version. We should bring the requirement of the usage and need
of that APIs to HDFS. Get the access throw some public interfacing. So, that
even though HDFS changes internal APIs, public interfacing would remains same.
So, Hbase/Other dependant users need need end up in reflections for every
version compatibility.
Thoughts?
> Make it clear that hbase 0.96 requires hadoop 1.0.0 at least; we will no
> longer work on older versions
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5536
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5536
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: stack
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>
> Looks like there is pretty much consensus that depending on 1.0.0 in 0.96
> should be fine? See
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/dSbVW14EsUb2/discuss+0.96&subj=RE+DISCUSS+Have+hbase+require+at+least+hadoop+1+0+0+in+hbase+0+96+0+
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
