saintstack commented on a change in pull request #762: HBASE-23157 WAL 
unflushed seqId tracking may wrong when Durability.AS…
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/762#discussion_r339368072
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/wal/SequenceIdAccounting.java
 ##########
 @@ -356,9 +356,36 @@ Long startCacheFlush(final byte[] encodedRegionName, 
final Map<byte[], Long> fam
     return lowestUnflushedInRegion;
   }
 
-  void completeCacheFlush(final byte[] encodedRegionName) {
+  void completeCacheFlush(byte[] encodedRegionName, long maxFlushedSeqId) {
+    // This is a simple hack to avoid maxFlushedSeqId go backwards.
+    // The system works fine normally, but if we make use of 
Durability.ASYNC_WAL and we are going
+    // to flush all the stores, the maxFlushedSeqId will be next seq id of the 
region, but we may
+    // still have some unsynced WAL entries in the ringbuffer after we call 
startCacheFlush, and
+    // then it will be recorded as the lowestUnflushedSeqId by the above 
update method, which is
+    // less than the current maxFlushedSeqId. And if next time we only flush 
the family with this
+    // unusual lowestUnflushedSeqId, the maxFlushedSeqId will go backwards.
+    // This is an unexpected behavior so we should fix it, otherwise it may 
cause unexpected
 
 Review comment:
   How we going to fix it? Can't we drive through the flush marker before 
completing the flush?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to