[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13249425#comment-13249425
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-5720:
------------------------------

@Matt I think you are making a new argument, number #4 I believe, for why we 
should do HBASE-4336.
                
> HFileDataBlockEncoderImpl uses wrong header size when reading HFiles with no 
> checksums
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5720
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5720
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: io, regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.0
>            Reporter: Matt Corgan
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.94.0
>
>         Attachments: 5720-trunk-v2.txt, 5720-trunk.txt, 5720v4.txt, 
> 5720v4.txt, 5720v4.txt, HBASE-5720-v1.patch, HBASE-5720-v2.patch, 
> HBASE-5720-v3.patch
>
>
> When reading a .92 HFile without checksums, encoding it, and storing in the 
> block cache, the HFileDataBlockEncoderImpl always allocates a dummy header 
> appropriate for checksums even though there are none.  This corrupts the 
> byte[].
> Attaching a patch that allocates a DUMMY_HEADER_NO_CHECKSUM in that case 
> which I think is the desired behavior.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to