[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13286154#comment-13286154
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6059:
----------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12530272/6059v7.txt
  against trunk revision .

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests.

    +1 hadoop2.0.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 2.0 profile.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

    -1 findbugs.  The patch appears to cause Findbugs (version 1.3.9) to fail.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

     -1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestAssignmentManager

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2063//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2063//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Replaying recovered edits would make deleted data exist again
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6059
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6059
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: chunhui shen
>            Assignee: chunhui shen
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: 6059v6.txt, 6059v7.txt, HBASE-6059-testcase.patch, 
> HBASE-6059.patch, HBASE-6059v2.patch, HBASE-6059v3.patch, HBASE-6059v4.patch, 
> HBASE-6059v5.patch
>
>
> When we replay recovered edits, we used the minSeqId of Store, It may cause 
> deleted data appeared again.
> Let's see how it happens. Suppose the region with two families(cf1,cf2)
> 1.put one data to the region (put r1,cf1:q1,v1)
> 2.move the region from server A to server B.
> 3.delete the data put by step 1(delete r1)
> 4.flush this region.
> 5.make major compaction for this region
> 6.move the region from server B to server A.
> 7.Abort server A
> 8.After the region is online, we could get the deleted data(r1,cf1:q1,v1)
> (When we replay recovered edits, we used the minSeqId of Store, because cf2 
> has no store files, so its seqId is 0, so the edit log of put data will be 
> replayed to the region)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to