[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13426596#comment-13426596
]
Jie Huang commented on HBASE-6460:
----------------------------------
bq. When you say ignore, do you mean treat it as a warning as opposed to a
error?
Without that *-fixHdfsOrphans* option, the hbck won't try to fix the problem as
you like.
Regarding the shortcut, from my perspective, we can let "-repairHoles" to fix
both items at the same time, which is quite acceptable literally. And I wonder
if it is OK to have another shortcut for "-fixAssignments -fixMeta", which aim
to solve the meta related parts. And then we can combine any single option
(like -fixHdfsHole) along with those options. What do you think?
> hbck "-repairHoles" shortcut doesn't enable "-fixHdfsOrphans"
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6460
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6460
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: hbck
> Affects Versions: 0.94.0, 0.96.0
> Reporter: Jie Huang
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: hbase-6460.patch
>
>
> According to the hbck's help info, shortcut - "-repairHoles" will enable
> "-fixHdfsOrphans" as below.
> {noformat}
> -repairHoles Shortcut for -fixAssignments -fixMeta -fixHdfsHoles
> -fixHdfsOrphans
> {noformat}
> However, in the implementation, the function "fsck.setFixHdfsOrphans(false);"
> is called in "-repairHoles". This is not consistent with the usage
> information.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
