[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13508112#comment-13508112
]
Adrian Muraru commented on HBASE-6580:
--------------------------------------
[~te...@apache.org] Thanks for having a look
bq. Why use double checked locking ? Connection would be used to create (at
least) one table, right ?
We want to have *multiple* HTable instances sharing the *same* HConnection
(this) and the same *ExecutorService* so I ensure only one executor is ever
instantiated
> New HTable pool, based on HBase(byte[], HConnection, ExecutorService)
> constructor
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6580
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6580
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.92.2, 0.94.2
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HBASE-6580_v1.patch, HBASE-6580_v2.patch
>
>
> Here I propose a very simple TablePool.
> It could be called LightHTablePool (or something - if you have a better name).
> Internally it would maintain an HConnection and an Executor service and each
> invocation of getTable(...) would create a new HTable and close() would just
> close it.
> In testing I find this more light weight than HTablePool and easier to
> monitor in terms of resources used.
> It would hardly be more than a few dozen lines of code.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
