[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13530749#comment-13530749
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6651:
----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12560716/HBASE-6651-V10.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 19 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
2.0 profile.

    {color:red}-1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated 
114 warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 findbugs{color}.  The patch appears to introduce 20 new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3519//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3519//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3519//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3519//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3519//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3519//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3519//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3519//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3519//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Improve thread safety of HTablePool
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6651
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.1
>            Reporter: Hiroshi Ikeda
>            Assignee: Hiroshi Ikeda
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-6651.patch, HBASE-6651-V10.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V2.patch, HBASE-6651-V3.patch, HBASE-6651-V4.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V5.patch, HBASE-6651-V6.patch, HBASE-6651-V7.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V8.patch, HBASE-6651-V9.patch, sample.zip, sample.zip, 
> sharedmap_for_hbaseclient.zip
>
>
> There are some operations in HTablePool accessing PoolMap in multiple places 
> without any explicit synchronization. 
> For example HTablePool.closeTablePool() calls PoolMap.values(), and calls 
> PoolMap.remove(). If other threads add new instances to the pool in the 
> middle of the calls, the newly added instances might be dropped. 
> (HTablePool.closeTablePool() also has another problem that calling it by 
> multiple threads causes accessing HTable by multiple threads.)
> Moreover, PoolMap is not thread safe for the same reason.
> For example PoolMap.put() calles ConcurrentMap.get() and calles 
> ConcurrentMap.put(). If other threads add a new instance to the concurent map 
> in the middle of the calls, the new instance might be dropped.
> And also implementations of Pool have the same problems.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to